A man diagnosed with HIV is humiliatingly
arrested and then sequestered in a tuberculosis ward where he is the sole
inmate. This dramatic scene might as well be fiction, seeing as it repeatedly
appears in such works as the novel The
Lost Flamingoes of Bombay (2009) by Siddharth Dhanvant Sanghvi and the film
My Brother... Nikhil (2005) by Onir.
Neither mentions the person who actually lived through those events. The year
was 1989; the place, Goa. Rather than being advised of his condition, a
frequent blood donor finds out he has contracted HIV upon being detained by the
authorities. His disease is equated with criminality. They knew him as Goa’s
Patient Zero: the first reported case of HIV. To me, he was my friend Dominic D’souza.
I remember when we first met.
“Hi, I’m Dominic”, he had said, but I hoped
he was not. The year was 1990 and I was being introduced to members of the
Mustard Seed Art Company in Panjim, Goa. When I auditioned to join the Seeds as
a teenager, I had heard of someone named Dominic who had been in the news.
Indeed, all of Goa, if not India, knew about that Dominic. Surely, it was only
a coincidence that the lead actor of the theatrical group had the same name as
that other person. This Dominic was solemn, yet charismatic. I was to find that
he could as easily be a goofball with a wicked sense of humour. His knack for
giving ear to my adolescent woes without judgement made us fast friends. So, to
me, my friend could certainly not have been that Dominic... or so I convinced
myself. For as long as the facts remained unclear, I could keep myself and my
parents in the dark. But in a small place like Goa, it was not long before they
discovered the truth. Having been curious about who this Dominic was, when they
had their suspicions confirmed, my parents confronted me. All I heard as they
upbraided me were not full sentences, not even phrases – it was just that word:
“AIDS”. It was the one thing I had hoped not to find out about my friend.
Looking back, I realise that most of what I
learned about Dominic’s activism came from others because he was never one to
seek plaudits. As a friend, Dominic was just that and never the public figure
he was elsewhere. The disease had brought him notoriety, but rather than being
concerned with how he had become infected, Dominic was more interested in how
he could change social perceptions about HIV/AIDS. In the film My Brother... Nikhil, I recognise the
activist, but I fail to see the Dominic I knew.
The movie’s title character is the son of
the Kapoors, a couple in Goa who, with their daughter Anamika, relate the
episodes of Nikhil’s life, in retrospect, between the late 1980s and early
1990s. Although the family’s ethnicity is not revealed, Anamika comments on how
her mother is proud of her Portuguese heritage. The father is perhaps, as one
might gather from the family name, of North Indian origin. The film is mainly
in Hindi, with a smattering of songs in Konkani, one of Goa’s official
languages. As the story develops, Nigel de Costa – Nikhil’s boyfriend – is introduced
as a Goan from Dubai. Even as the movie fictionalises Dominic’s life, it
appears to be uncertain about how to represent Goanness, in the midst of portraying
gay identity in India, while also making a point about the ostracism faced by
those with HIV/AIDS.
Though Goa was a Portuguese colony for 451
years, interraciality was rare. It is thus striking that the Kapoors are cast
as a family whose Goanness is created by coupling characters that are of North
Indian and Portuguese heritage. In their ability to speak Hindi and being, at
least part, North Indian, the family is expected to appear more Indian than had
they been distinctly Goan, an ethnicity often rendered as anomalous to
mainstream Indic culture. Interestingly, the Kapoors’ religious persuasion is
also left unclear, lest the prospect that they are Christian inhibit them from
being seen as the average Indian family. What this negates is that while
Christianity in Goa is syncretically Indian, the majority of Goa’s people are,
in fact, Hindu. Delivering some of his reminiscences about his boyfriend
against the backdrop of a Church, Nigel is meant to be seen as a Christian.
Yet, as the foreign-returned Indian who challenges Nikhil for being in the
closet, Nigel’s openness is associated with him having lived abroad. His
liberal nature is also linked to his financial security, evidenced by his
beachfront property. These ambivalent characterisations, then, partake of
Dominic’s life story as a Goan person, but attempt to subsume Goanness within a
general perception of Indianness. At the same time, the film aims to focus on
the trauma of its gay Indian characters by making their struggles synonymous
with a more global interpretation of gay rights, itself associated with being
male and middle class. Relying on the “Indo-Portuguese” and diasporic
identities of the lovers as multiculturality, the film attaches the travails of
its characters to the plight of other gay men like them in the world beyond
India.
While AIDS cannot be separated from the
history of the gay rights movement in the decades since the disease’s advent,
it has never been an affliction that only befalls homosexual men. In his review
of We Were Here (2011), Andrew Pulver
of The Guardian applauds David
Weismann and Bill Weber’s documentary about “the ravages of the AIDS virus ... on
early 1980s San Francisco, where thousands of gay men died ... before
prevention education and community activism helped slow the devastation”. But
Pulver notes that “the ongoing disaster in Africa gets barely a mention”.
Indeed, this omission occurs because We
Were Here spotlights the experiences of white gay men, which are meant to
stand in for those of all HIV/AIDS victims in 1980s America. Among the film’s
main interviewees, only one is an African American. Though gay men were at the
forefront of AIDS activism in the 1980s, the film notes that lesbians also
looked out for the community, but little is said about how the disease affected
people of different socio-economic and racial backgrounds, many of whom
participated in the movement too. That these AIDS-related issues in the United
States are themselves connected to access to care across the globe is
additionally occluded by the film’s myopia.
Similarly, My Brother... Nikhil, purportedly the first Indian film about
homosexuality, “owns” AIDS as a gay disease – In it, the greater risk of
contracting HIV through homosexuality becomes symbolic of the trauma of being a
middle class, Indian, gay man. In the hateful Goa of the film, already having
to deal with the incarceration of his HIV-infected lover, Nigel returns home
one day to see the word “faggot” spray-painted on the walls of his house.
Forgoing Hindi, which the film had to this moment used as its mode of
expression, the slur in English communicates local knowledge of homophobia from
the world beyond. Literally, the writing is on the wall as provincial Goa
becomes no different than the rest of the planet in its treatment of gay men
because of AIDS.
While the film does well to identify
prejudice and the need to address it, in parlaying Dominic’s legacy into an insular
form of activism, it denies the greater activist potential of the queer
movement. In the movie, Nikhil establishes an organisation called People
Positive, mirroring Dominic’s own work in creating a non-profit called Positive
People which was the first Goan organisation of its kind and one that still
exists. Despite the way he had been treated, Dominic loved Goa and saw himself
as part of it. He wanted that no one else in Goa should have to go through what
he did. Simultaneously, his advocacy efforts took him around the world where he
became a voice for those discriminated against because of HIV/AIDS. This
contrasts with My Brother... Nikhil
where discrimination becomes the driving force for instituting a gay identity
that separates itself from ethnicity while conjoining with more global
iterations of gay rights that are largely male- and middle class-centric. At a
moment where gay rights in several parts of the world has become so eminently
concentrated on marriage equality, AIDS activism no longer occupies centre
stage as it did historically. Due to advances in medicine, living with HIV is
no more the death sentence it was, but this is not a global phenomenon and
access to healthcare, even in countries like the United States, leaves much to
be desired for communities of colour and those who are low income. Dominic’s
brand of activism is a reminder that acceptance cannot be narrowly defined.
I remember the last time we spoke. It was
the only occasion Dominic said anything about his activist work to me. He
mentioned an impending conference abroad. Suddenly, he was not just a friend I
knew from the theatre, who laughed at my jokes, and empathised with me. He was
someone whose influence touched the lives of people on the world stage.
Dominic, I did not get to say goodbye to
you twenty years ago in May 1992 when you breathed your last in a Bombay
hospital. I had hoped you were not that other Dominic, because it would mean
losing you. But the world is a better place because you were in it. Not a day
goes by that you are not remembered, my friend. Rest in peace...
To purchase a copy of Trikone, visit their website. This article has also been reprinted in the Summer 2013 issue of Pink Pages. Another article on the film My Brother... Nikhil appears in the March 2011 issue of the Journal of Creative Communications.
To purchase a copy of Trikone, visit their website. This article has also been reprinted in the Summer 2013 issue of Pink Pages. Another article on the film My Brother... Nikhil appears in the March 2011 issue of the Journal of Creative Communications.