On 20 October, two
children in Faridabad, outside Delhi, lost
their lives in a fire. Two days earlier, a
man whose car broke down in Palm Beach County,
Florida, was fired at by a policeman, and was killed. The children were Dalit
and the man from Florida was black. In mentioning these two incidents, from
either side of the planet, it is to draw attention to the on-going violence
against minority communities in India and the United States.
In the recent event cited above, where Floridian Corey Jones was
awaiting a tow-truck because his car had broken down, the police claimed that
he had been confrontational. While it was true that Jones did have a gun, it
later became apparent that he had not fired it.
Nevertheless, Jones was shot and killed. Consider, too, that several white
Americans with guns have perpetrated mass killings in recent years, and that
such occurrences are generally not analysed by the media as acts of racism or
terrorism. Even when Dylann
Roof shot and killed nine congregants at a historically black church in
Charleston, South Carolina in June this year, the white shooter was treated
humanely during his arrest.
In comparing the police treatment of black people in the States
to that of Dalits and other minorities in India, it is rather striking that Jitender
Kumar, the father of Vaibhav and Divya, the two children who lost their lives
in the Faridabad fire, claimed police
negligence following an incident involving members of the Rajput community.
As The Hindu (29 October, 2015) reports,
“The attack on the Dalit family is being linked to the murder of three members
of the Rajput community on October 5 last year. Twelve members of Jitender’s
family were named in that case and they are currently in jail”. The article
continues to say that “Jitender’s family was threatened with dire consequences
if it did not leave the village” and that though “given police security”, the
father of the slain children “accused the local police of not taking any action
on his complaint”.
With alarmingly
frequency now, one hears of incidents that take place in India where Muslims
are targeted based on mere suspicion of flouting the law or custom. Take the
September lynching of
Mohammad Akhlaq in Uttar Pradesh, who had been fatally set upon by a mob for
supposedly eating beef despite a state ban against its consumption. Or the more
recent incident involving a Muslim barber in Karnataka who refused to shut his practice on a Tuesday, thereby hurting the sentiments of the local Hindu
community who do not cut their hair on that day of the week, as reported by the
Hindustan Times (28 October, 2015).
The barber’s refusal to close shop led to a riot.
To say that such
reactions as a lynching and a riot are extreme detracts attention from the
larger issue at hand. In a purportedly secular democracy, how is it that the
sentiments, customs, and traditions of the upper caste have come to represent
an unquestioned moral hegemony, where said powerful group acts like an
affronted minority? To the extent that such moral policing is both enshrined in
law and backed by state-surveillance, if not a lynch-mob that can run amok with
no legal consequences, speaks to the precarity of rights available to religious
and other minorities in the contemporary Indian nation-state. The same can be
said of the United States, where even making a clock can lead to the detention
of a Muslim youth. This was the case last month when teenager Ahmed Mohamed was suspected of being a
bomb-maker because he put
together a timepiece at home and brought it to his school in Texas.
In the United
States and India, then, both democracies, one is led to wonder about such
highly held concepts as equality and the value placed on life where those very
concepts seem so fickle.
From The Goan.
No comments:
Post a Comment